|
by Henry Shir
Selecting the right motor and associated equipment for a project requires a close look at the options.
While designations such as energy-efficient and premium-efficient have been used in engineering specifications and motor catalogs for years, facility professionals are now required to specify energy-efficient motors by federal law. The Energy Policy Act (EPACT) of 1992 mandates motor efficiency requirements for the types of motors facility professionals commonly specify.
EPACT requires that induction motors used for HVAC applications meet the full-load efficiency requirements of NEMA standard MGI - 1993 if the motors run at 3,600, 1,800 or 1,200 rpm for motors powered at 230/460 volts. The EPACT requirements cover both totally enelosed fan cooled (TEFC) and open drip proof (ODP) motors up to 200 hp. For HVAC applications, totally enclosed motors typically are found in cooling tower applications with ODP motors in the majority of other applications, such as air handling unit fans and pumps. For HVAC applications, most motors run at 1,800 rpm. Some pump motors are specified at 1,200 rpm, especially for cooling tower applications where minimum net positive suction head is a problem. Motors specified at 3,500 rpm are used for some boiler feed pumps, but normally should not be used in HVAC applications due to noise problems.
At 1,800 rpm, a 1 hp ODP motor needs to have a minimum efficiency of 82.5 percent, while at 200 hp the efficiency requirement is 95 percent. Motors with these efficiencies are available in the catalogs of most major motor manufacturers. All efficiency testing must be performed in accordance with IEEE Standard 112, Test Method B. Facility professionals requiring specific efficiencies for a particular motor should consult Table 12-10 in the NEMA standard mentioned above for the motor types and speeds that the standard covers.
Facility professionals should verify that new motors have the required nameplate with the NEMA efficiency stamped on it. Facility professionals should state in specifications that the motor have at least the minimum efficiency in the NEMA standard for its size and type, when tested in accordance with IEEE Standard 112, Test Method B. Specifiers should not merely state that energy-efficient or premium-efficient motors be provided, as these terms in themselves do not meet the requirements of the federal law. Shop drawings for all motor-powered equipment must be checked to ensure that minimum efficiencies are met.
Motors are typically not a separate shop drawing item but are included with the fan or pump being submitted. Typically, only the horsepower and voltage characteristics of the motor will be included in the submittal; the facility professional must request the efficiency data separately.
Smaller fractional horsepower motors — which are typically less efficient — are not covered by the federal standard. These motors can amount to a significant building load if enough are used. An example is an office building using series-type fan-powered terminal boxes with many small motors powering fans that run constantly during the occupied cycle. Even though these motors are not covered by the federal standard, facility professionals should still specify the most efficient motors available.
Even though energy efficiency is a prime consideration when specifying electric motors, other factors are important. Consider the type of motor to be used, motor speed — which may not be the same as the fan speed — the number of speeds the motor has, type of motor drive, overload capability, and coordination of motor requirements between the HVAC and electrical engineer.
Motor Type.
Cooling tower fan motors are typically TEFC or totally enclosed air over with a fan rather than openings to provide cooling. These motors can survive the wet environment of a cooling tower. Special coatings are applied to the motor windings to aid in moisture protection. Some towers that use centrifugal fans have the motor located outside the wet airstream. These fan motors can be ODP.
Some environments — for instance, where combustible vapors are present or other hazardous conditions exist — require explosion-proof motors and other electrical components, such as junction boxes. Explosion-proof motors have enclosures that prevent the ignition of gases or vapors. They are more expensive and should be specified only if the authority having jurisdiction over the project determines their use is required. That authority may be the local fire chief, the owner’s insurer or the architect. The electrical engineer usually investigates whether explosion-proof motors are required, as receptacles and lighting must be explosion-proof as well. The National Electrical Code articles 500 through 516 determines whether explosion-proof motors and equipment are required. These articles cover many different classifications ofhazardous environments.
Motor Speed.
Motors spinning at 3,600, although commonly used for process applications, should rarely be used for HVAC applications because they can cause noise disturbances. An exception is some types of boiler feed pumps. Some small direct-drive motors for ceiling exhaust fans and fan coils have motors that spin at 1,050 or 1,550 rpm, the lower speed being preferable for acoustical reasons. Other rpms may occasionally be found in manufacturers’ catalogs for various types of small direct drive fans.
Two-speed motors are commonly used in HVAC applications where occupied and unoccupied cycles are required for a fan, on fume-hood applications to save energy when a sash is lowered and as a means of capacity control for cooling towers. If the low speed cfm of a fan is to be one-half of the high speed cfm, then the low speed rpm of the motor must also be one-half of the high speed rpm. Many two-speed motors have a low speed that is 67 percent of the high speed, which, if specified, will not produce the desired results.
If a two-speed motor is specified, a two-speed starter also must be specified. Two-speed starters have two contractors and are close to double the cost of single-speed starters. As more facilities use variable frequency drives (VFD) and their costs come down, two-speed motors will be used less. The energy savings for a VFD are significantly greater than for a two-speed motor, assuming the motor load can vary continuously downward. In some cases where only two-speed operation is desired, such as an occupied unoccupied cycle for a fan motor, a variable speed drive (VSD) is still purchased to allow for greater flexibility of adjustment.
Motor Drives.
Belt-drive motors are generally preferred for fan applications due to the ability to adjust the drive. This is important, as the installed static pressure in the ductwork is often different from the engineer’s original calculation. Sometimes, the fan does not perform according to its fan curve, and its speed must be adjusted in the field — although this is more unusual than static pressure variation. On small fans under 200 cfm, only direct-drive motors may be available. These should always be specified with speed controllers to make air flow adjustment possible.
![]()
|